Research & intelligence
Evidence before conclusions.
Understand the case. Investigate the counterparty.
Connect legal research with the facts behind a business or dispute. Get a position you can challenge, a dossier you can inspect, and a clear account of what still needs checking.
01 / Counterparty dossier
Follow the ownership, not just the name.
Ask a question in ordinary language. The agent queries the in-house Ukrainian open-data warehouse and assembles the relevant findings.
An evidence trail, not a confidence score.
How evidence is classified · explanatory diagram, not product UI
One exact entity. No merged namesakes.
Resolve by ЄДРПОУ or РНОКПП before combining records.
S01Registry records
S02Comparable statements
- Registry fact01
- Calculated metric02
- Interpretation03
Report
Registry records inform facts and interpretation. Comparable statements inform calculations. All three belong in the report; interpretation is not proof.
Ownership edges need a source, a role, and an effective date. A shared address alone is not proof of control.
The evidence ledger
Open a finding to see what supports it.
Registry factA founder and their recorded ownership share.
A fact comes from a specific source record. Match the exact entity and retain the role, share, and date recorded there.
Entity record · Effective date + ingestion date
Calculated metricA year-on-year change you can recalculate.
For a non-zero prior value: (current − prior) ÷ prior × 100. The periods, currency, and units must be comparable; the formula belongs beside the result.
Annual statements · Comparable periods and units
InterpretationMajority control deserves a closer look.
An analytical observation, not a registry fact or a risk score. Verify the current ownership and relevant changes before drawing a conclusion.
Analysis of the records · Current official check still required
Build the scope around the decision
- People & history
- Directors, founders, beneficiaries, registration changes
- Finance & trade
- Financial trends, procurement, customs
- Courts & debt
- Case roles, enforcement, bankruptcy
- Permissions & compliance
- Tax, licences, sanctions, inspections
- Property & affiliations
- Assets and evidenced relationships
02 / Adversarial analysis
A strong position can face a strong objection.
Ask the agent to build the position, then test the facts and assumptions it depends on. Specialist agents can review alternative readings independently.
The proposed position
“The delivery was accepted.”
Supporting material
A delivery note and the parties’ correspondence.
The opposing argument
“Did the person accepting it have authority?”
Evidence still needed
Authority documents and the complete exchange around acceptance.
What changes if a key assumption is wrong?
- Applicable legal version
- Procedural deadlines
- Limitation periods
- Wartime timing
Carry forward an evidence matrix, a case timeline, identified gaps, and a roadmap for strengthening the position.
03 / From source to report
Keep the trail. Not just the answer.
A report you can take forward
Illustrative report structure
- 01
Findings and the question answered
- 02
Sources, facts, and calculations
- 03
Arguments and counterarguments
- 04
Coverage, conflicts, and uncertainty
- 05
Recommended live and manual checks
Review the research plan before execution. Open the final report in its own panel, edit it when backed by a project file, and keep it in your workspace.
Supported report exports
- .md
- .doc
- .docx
- .xlsx
Your next research brief
“Prepare a due-diligence dossier for this counterparty. Map ownership, review finances and court exposure, and separate confirmed facts from missing coverage. Then challenge our proposed legal position.”